What Do Multiwinner Voting Rules Do? An Experiment Over the Two-Dimensional Euclidean Domain
نویسندگان
چکیده
We visualize aggregate outputs of popular multiwinner voting rules—SNTV, STV, Bloc, k-Borda, Monroe, Chamberlin– Courant, and PAV—for elections generated according to the two-dimensional Euclidean model. We consider three applications of multiwinner voting, namely, parliamentary elections, portfolio/movie selection, and shortlisting, and use our results to understand which of our rules seem to be best suited for each application. In particular, we show that STV (one of the few nontrivial rules used in real high-stake elections) exhibits excellent performance, whereas the Bloc rule (also often used in practice) performs poorly.
منابع مشابه
Properties of multiwinner voting rules
The goal of this paper is to propose and study properties of multiwinner voting rules (with a particular focus on rules based in some way on single-winner scoring rules). We consider, e.g., SNTV, Bloc, k-Borda, STV, and several variants of Chamberlin–Courant’s and Monroe’s rules, identify two natural approaches to defining multiwinner rules, and show that many of our rules can be captured by on...
متن کاملModeling Representation of Minorities Under Multiwinner Voting Rules
The goal of this paper is twofold. First and foremost, we aim to experimentally and quantitatively show that the choice of a multiwinner voting rule can play a crucial role on the way minorities are represented. We also test the possibility for some of these rules to achieve proportional representation.
متن کاملConsistent Approval-Based Multi-Winner Rules
This paper is an axiomatic study of consistent approval-based multi-winner rules, i.e., voting rules that select a fixed-size group of candidates based on approval ballots. We introduce the class of counting rules, provide an axiomatic characterization of this class and, in particular, show that counting rules are consistent. Building upon this result, we axiomatically characterize three import...
متن کاملMultiwinner Approval Rules as Apportionment Methods
We establish a link between multiwinner elections and apportionment problems by showing how approval-based multiwinner election rules can be interpreted as methods of apportionment. We consider several multiwinner rules and observe that they induce apportionment methods that are well-established in the literature on proportional representation. For instance, we show that Proportional Approval V...
متن کاملCondorcet Consistent Bundling with Social Choice
We study the problem of computing optimal bundles given agents’ preferences over individual items when agents derive satisfaction from the entire bundle under constraints on the size k of the bundle. Building on the notion of Condorcet winning sets by Gehrlein [16], we extend common Condorcet consistent voting rules from the single winner voting setting to that of forming bundles of size k. Our...
متن کامل